Which statement is least aligned with trauma-informed practice when risk assessing a victim?

• A. Conducting assessment with consent and sensitivity
• B. Identifying safety risks to the victim
• C. Referring to safety resources as needed
• D. Performing the assessment without victim consent and with coercion

Answer: (D)

Trauma-informed risk assessment centers on consent, safety, and empowering the victim to participate at their own pace. The least aligned approach is conducting the assessment without consent and with coercion because it violates autonomy and undermines safety. For someone who has experienced trauma, pressuring or forcing an assessment can retraumatize, erode trust, and make them less willing to engage with support or safety planning.

In contrast, conducting the assessment with consent and sensitivity respects the person’s boundaries and pace, reducing potential harm. Identifying safety risks to the victim is a core safety-priority step, ensuring immediate and practical protection. Referring to safety resources as needed offers options and support without imposing them, aligning with a victim-centered approach that honors choice.