Which of the following best describes how to document an unfounded determination in a victim-centered investigation?

• A. Record the unfounded determination with a standard explanation and provide resources for the survivor.
• B. Delete all records of the report to avoid stigma.
• C. Mark the case as unfounded without any explanation.
• D. Document the unfounded determination with a clear explanation and resource referrals.

Answer: (D)

In a victim-centered investigation, when a case is deemed unfounded, the record should clearly explain the basis for that determination and connect the survivor with appropriate resources. This means outlining what evidence was reviewed, what standards or policy criteria were applied, and why there wasn’t enough credible evidence to substantiate the report. It also means providing concrete referrals for services such as counseling, advocacy, safety planning, or legal assistance to support the survivor moving forward. Keeping the documentation intact preserves accountability and allows for review if new information emerges, rather than erasing the record. Deleting records undermines accountability and survivor rights; marking a case without any explanation leaves the survivor in the dark; providing only a generic or minimal explanation without connecting to resources fails to support the survivor. Documenting with a clear explanation and resource referrals best aligns with victim-centered practice.