How should interpreters be used in victim interviews?

• A. Use family members for interpretation
• B. Use qualified interpreters, brief them on limits of confidentiality, ensure accurate translation, avoid family members in critical disclosures, and document language needs
• C. Translate only key phrases
• D. Proceed without language support

Answer: (B)

Interviews with victims must rely on accurate, confidential language access. Using qualified interpreters ensures the translation is precise, culturally appropriate, and neutral, preserving the full meaning of what the victim and interviewer exchange and preventing misinterpretation that could affect safety or outcomes. Briefing the interpreter on limits of confidentiality is essential so they understand their professional obligations and what information can be shared, which helps maintain trust and protects sensitive disclosures. Avoiding family members in critical disclosures prevents dual relationships, potential bias, and coercion that can color what the victim chooses to reveal or how it’s translated. Documenting language needs creates a clear record of who translated, the language used, and any translation challenges, supporting the integrity of the interview and any follow-up or legal proceedings. Translating only key phrases risks missing important details and nuance, while proceeding without language support effectively silences the victim or leads to unsafe misunderstandings.